Movie Stills of New York Locations Juxtaposed with Real Life
Nhận đường liên kết
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Ứng dụng khác
-
Journalist Christopher Moloney had an epiphany while walking through Central Park one day, “Every day I walked past tons of locations from popular—and not-so-popular—movies,” he explains. He decided to start printing out stills from the films and comparing them to their real-life counterparts. “Since then, I’ve re-created more than 250 scenes around the city.” His work—which includes movies as varied as Midnight Run, The French Connection, and Shaft—can be found at his Web site, FILMography.
“I’m actually surprised that locations used in the 1940s and 1950s haven’t changed that much,” he says. “But places used in movies last year are virtually unrecognizable.” New York also changes depending on the director, Moloney adds. “You can tell just how much filmmakers like Woody Allen and Martin Scorsese and Spike Lee love the city. It’s sometimes hard to believe that those three very different places are all the same city.” [viaVanity Fair]
Léon: The Professional, 1994
Christopher Moloney/Filmography
Annie Hall, 1977
"Whenever I see a movie and there's a bookstore scene, I get very sad, because that bookstore is probably gone," Moloney says. "I could never recreate that."
20 cancer patients participated in a unique makeover experience. They were invited to a studio. Their hair and makeup were completely redone. During the transformation, they were asked to keep their eyes shut. A photographer then immortalized the moment they opened their eyes. This discovery allowed them to forget their illness, IF ONLY FOR A SECOND. "Within a second, smiling faces were seen all over the room. At that very moment, cancer did not exist for the family members either." You can order the book and learn more about the campaign, launched today, at the "If Only for a Second" website .
This is not Photoshopped apart from cropping and some adjustment to local brightness levels. The gull actually has no feet. It is 3 wing beats from having made a water take-off. The FZ1000.2 can manage bids in flight and much more quite competently. The original FZ1000, announced five years ago has been one of the best all purpose, do (almost) everything, freedom-from-changing-lenses camera models that you can buy. The Sony RX10.4 has more lens reach and a faster frame rate for continuous focus but is larger, heavier and much more expensive than the FZ1000. In addition the user interface is not as well designed. The FZ1000.2 is a mild upgrade to the original with most of the changes going to further improve what was already a pleasing user experience. In addition there are several upgrades to autofocus capability which I will discuss in this post as they affect the way the camera is best set up and operated. Accessories One of the nice things about this camer...
Panasonic cameras including the FZ1000.2 have very good auto pano capability. My apologies for the boring nature of this post. But menus are like that. Also apologies for the cryptic nature of some of my comments. I lack the energy to fully discuss the pros and cons of every option. The FZ1000.2 has Panasonic’s recently re-vamped menu system with a very nice graphic user interface, submenus in the Custom tab and a My Menu. There is still room for further improvement however. I would like to see the whole menu system revised from scratch with a new set of submenus based on more photographer relevant categories. The basic outline for my suggestion for these is something like: Setup>General/Controls/Viewing/Files Capture>Image/Focus/Exposure/Drive Movie Review Connect As it stands the submenus [camera] and [custom] don’t really mean anything. All the other camera makers present the user with the same kinds of issues in the menus. In this post I will not deal with Movie ...
The American Museum of Natural History is one of the world's preeminent scientific and cultural institutions. Since its founding in 1869, the American Museum of Natural History has collected more than 32 million specimens relating to the natural world and human cultures. The Museum showcases its amazing treasures in the exhibit halls, and behind the scenes more than 200 scientists are at work making new discoveries. Millions of people from around the world visit the Museum each year. For information on current exhibitions and upcoming events, visit http://www.amnh.org/calendar. Fred Scherer installing Birds of Paradise Group, 1945 Photographing Tyrannosaurus skeleton, 1937 Museum staff painting background and mounting animals for Tiger Group, Asian Hall, 1934 Museum staff cleaning elephant skin, 1933 Museum staff mounting Brontosaurus skeleton forelimb, Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1904 Preparing African Buffalo Group, 1934 Museum staff preparing African Lion Group, 1935 ...
Chief camera designer on the lookout for new ergonomic mistakes Many camera historians identify the UR-Leica of 1914 as the fore-runner of the modern hand held camera. With over a hundred years evolution you might expect that modern cameras would have gotten their user interface to a point that most people can pick one up and work it right away. Motor cars have a similar historical timeline. The Ford model T automobile started mass production on an assembly line in 1913. Automobiles have evolved to the point that I can hire one anywhere in the world and expect to be able to drive it using a set of controls which with a few minor exceptions (like the windscreen wipers) are universal everywhere. If this were not so all pedestrians and most vehicle users would be dead by now. Cameras are a totally different story. The people who design and make cameras continue to bequeath their products with a bewildering muddle of different types and designs of controls. Even within any one make o...
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét